Official Series Description


Lab Data Summary

Aggregate lab data for the WIND RIVER soil series. This aggregation is based on all pedons with a current taxon name of WIND RIVER, and applied along 1-cm thick depth slices. Solid lines are the slice-wise median, bounded on either side by the interval defined by the slice-wise 5th and 95th percentiles. The median is the value that splits the data in half. Five percent of the data are less than the 5th percentile, and five percent of the data are greater than the 95th percentile. Values along the right hand side y-axis describe the proportion of pedon data that contribute to aggregate values at this depth. For example, a value of "90%" at 25cm means that 90% of the pedons correlated to WIND RIVER were used in the calculation. Source: KSSL snapshot . Methods used to assemble the KSSL snapshot used by SoilWeb / SDE

Click the image to view it full size.

Pedons used in the lab summary:

MLRALab IDPedon IDTaxonnameCINSSL / NASIS ReportsLink To SoilWeb GMap
640A0851S1961OR027007Wind River4Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties45.6808319,-121.5258331
640A0850S1961OR027008Wind River5Primary | Supplementary | Taxonomy | Pedon | Water Retention | Correlation | Andic Soil Properties45.6961098,-121.5161133

Water Balance

Monthly water balance estimated using a leaky-bucket style model for the WIND RIVER soil series. Monthly precipitation (PPT) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) have been estimated from the 50th percentile of gridded values (PRISM 1981-2010) overlapping with the extent of SSURGO map units containing each series as a major component. Monthly PET values were estimated using the method of Thornthwaite (1948). These (and other) climatic parameters are calculated with each SSURGO refresh and provided by the fetchOSD function of the soilDB package. Representative water storage values (“AWC” in the figures) were derived from SSURGO by taking the 50th percentile of profile-total water storage (sum[awc_r * horizon thickness]) for each soil series. Note that this representation of “water storage” is based on the average ability of most plants to extract soil water between 15 bar (“permanent wilting point”) and 1/3 bar (“field capacity”) matric potential. Soil moisture state can be roughly interpreted as “dry” when storage is depleted, “moist” when storage is between 0mm and AWC, and “wet” when there is a surplus. Clearly there are a lot of assumptions baked into this kind of monthly water balance. This is still a work in progress.

Click the image to view it full size.



Click the image to view it full size.

Sibling Summary

Siblings are those soil series that occur together in map units, in this case with the WIND RIVER series. Sketches are arranged according to their subgroup-level taxonomic structure. Source: SSURGO snapshot , parsed OSD records and snapshot of SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the WIND RIVER series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the WIND RIVER series and siblings. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Small Shannon entropy values suggest relatively consistent geomorphic association, while larger values suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Competing Series

Soil series competing with WIND RIVER share the same family level classification in Soil Taxonomy. Source: parsed OSD records and snapshot of the SC database .

Click the image to view it full size.

Select annual climate data summaries for the WIND RIVER series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of median values. Source: SSURGO map unit geometry and 1981-2010, 800m PRISM data .

Click the image to view it full size.

Geomorphic description summaries for the WIND RIVER series and competing. Series are sorted according to hierarchical clustering of proportions and relative hydrologic position within an idealized landform (e.g. top to bottom). Proportions can be interpreted as an aggregate representation of geomorphic membership. Most soil series (SSURGO components) are associated with a hillslope position and one or more landform-specific positions: hills, mountain slopes, terraces, and/or flats. The values printed to the left (number of component records) and right (Shannon entropy) of stacked bars can be used to judge the reliability of trends. Shannon entropy values close to 0 represent soil series with relatively consistent geomorphic association, while values close to 1 suggest lack thereof. Source: SSURGO component records .

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

Click the image to view it full size.

There are insufficient data to create the 3D flats position figure.

Soil series sharing subgroup-level classification with WIND RIVER, arranged according to family differentiae. Hovering over a series name will print full classification and a small sketch from the OSD. Source: snapshot of SC database .

Block Diagrams

No block diagrams are available.

Map Units

Map units containing WIND RIVER as a major component. Limited to 250 records.

Map Unit Name Symbol Map Unit Area (ac) Map Unit Key National Map Unit Symbol Soil Survey Area Publication Date Map Scale
Wind River-Grove-Waterman families complex, 25 to 70 percent slopes.30415915471313htfnca71319841:24000
Chaix-Wind River family-Tollhouse association, sloping5095017465209hm2rca76019811:24000
Wind River family-Rock outcrop association, moderately steep6664859465248hm40ca76019811:24000
Wind River family-Dome-Rock outcrop association, moderately steep6871439465262hm4gca76019811:24000
Wind River family-Rock outcrop association, steep6671182465249hm41ca76019811:24000
Wind River family-Monache variant, drained, warm association, sloping3021032465177hm1qca76019811:24000
Morical-Wind River families complex, 30 to 50 percent slopesMbF14710471661htswca77719811:24000
Morical-Wind River families complex, 15 to 30 percent slopesMbE14585471660htsvca77719811:24000
Wind River-Oak Glen families association, 2 to 15 percent slopesKoD6060471655htspca77719811:24000
Wind River fine sandy loam, 0 to 8 percent slopes26B8616203022jzor62919751:20000
Wind River variant gravelly sandy loam, 0 to 8 percent slopes27B7856203222k1or62919751:20000
Wind River fine sandy loam, 8 to 12 percent slopes26C4056203122k0or62919751:20000
Wind River variant gravelly sandy loam, 8 to 30 percent slopes27E1086203322k2or62919751:20000
Wind River fine sandy loam, 0 to 8 percent slopes56B12146302623l3or67319751:20000
Wind River fine sandy loam, 8 to 12 percent slopes56C6586302723l4or67319751:20000
Wind River gravelly loam, 0 to 8 percent slopesWrB1780720832f08wa01119721:20000
Wind River sandy loam, 0 to 8 percent slopesWnB540720802f05wa01119721:20000
Wind River gravelly loam, 12 to 50 percent slopesWrF360720842f09wa01119721:20000
Wind River sandy loam, 30 to 65 percent slopesWnG240720822f07wa01119721:20000
Wind River sandy loam, 8 to 20 percent slopesWnD230720812f06wa01119721:20000
Wind River fine sandy loam, 5 to 10 percent slopes737165764652kkmwa63920031:24000

Map of Series Extent

Approximate geographic distribution of the WIND RIVER soil series. To learn more about how this distribution was mapped, or to compare this soil series extent to others, use the Series Extent Explorer (SEE) application. Source: generalization of SSURGO geometry .